Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SLOWCHOCOLATE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-12-17 — Application filed
  • 2009-12-21 — Application filed
  • 2009-12-23 — Application filed
  • 2009-12-24 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2010-03-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-04-07 — Office action issued
  • 2010-04-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-04-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-04-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-04-27 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-06-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-06-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-07-27 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-11-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-11-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-03 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2010-11-03 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2010-11-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-11-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-12-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-12-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-29 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2011-05-26 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2011-05-26 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2011-05-26 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2011-06-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-06-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-06-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-07-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-07-19 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2011-07-19 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2011-07-28 — Paper received
  • 2011-08-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-08-10 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2011-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-08-22 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2011-09-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-09-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-09-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-03-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-04-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-07-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-07-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-07-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-07-23 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2012-07-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-08-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-08-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-08-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-08-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-08-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-09-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-09-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-11-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2013-04-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-04-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-04-23 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-04-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2013-05-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-05-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2013-05-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-11-01 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-11-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2013-11-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2013-11-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-01-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-05-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-05-06 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2014-05-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2014-05-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-11-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-11-06 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2014-11-13 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2014-11-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-04-30 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2015-04-30 — Use amendment filed
  • 2015-05-10 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2015-05-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2015-05-30 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2015-07-07 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-07-07 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-07-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-07-27 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-07-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-07-27 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-07-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-07-27 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2022-01-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-01-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

THE WORLD INSTITUTE OF SLOWNESS AS
KRISTIANSAND S NO
THE WORLD INSTITUTE OF SLOWNESS AS
KRISTIANSAND S NO
Berthelsen, Geir
Kristiansand NO
Berthelsen, Geir
Kristiansand NO

Correspondent

Connie Ellerbach FENWICK & WEST LLP
801 CALIFORNIA STREET
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-12-17
Status Date:
2022-01-14
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.