Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BISCOFF BISCOFF EUROPE'S FAVORITE COOKIE WITH COFFEE LOTUS LOTUS LOTUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-06-03 — Application filed
  • 2010-06-07 — Application filed
  • 2010-06-09 — Application filed
  • 2010-06-10 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2010-09-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-12-13 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-15 — Office action issued
  • 2011-01-11 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-01-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-01-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-03-17 — Office action issued
  • 2011-03-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-03-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-04-28 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2011-04-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-04-29 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-05-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-05-05 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-05-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-01 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-06-01 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-06-01 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-06-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-06-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-06-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-06-24 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2011-07-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2011-07-25 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-07-25 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-07-25 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-07-25 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-07-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-08-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-09-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-09-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-11-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-04-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-04-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2012-04-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2012-04-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-10-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-10-29 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2012-11-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-11-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2012-11-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-04-29 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-04-29 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-05-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-01-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2014-01-25 — Final status recorded
  • 2014-01-27 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Lotus Bakeries
Lembeke BE
Lotus Bakeries
Lembeke BE

Correspondent

DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERONI, P.C.
425 5TH AVE FL 5
NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-06-03
Status Date:
2014-01-25
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.