Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2011 ›
VE ›
VENKY'S
Trademark search for:
VENKY'S
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-01-10 — Application filed
2007-01-17 — Application filed
2007-01-18 — Notice of design search code mailed
2007-04-30 — Assigned to examiner
2007-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2007-05-14 — Office action issued
2007-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2007-05-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-05-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-05-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-06-21 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-21 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-04 — Notice of publication
2007-07-24 — Published for opposition
2007-08-22 — Extension of time to oppose received
2007-10-09 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2009-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2011-01-07 — Ttab release case to trademarks
2011-01-07 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2011-01-07 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2011-02-22 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-09-26 — Application abandoned
2011-09-26 — Application abandoned
2011-09-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Uttara Foods and Feeds PVT. LTD.
Pune Maharashtra IN
Uttara Foods and Feeds PVT. LTD.
Pune Maharashtra IN
Correspondent
KRISTAN B. BURCH KAUFMAN & CANOLES 150 W MAIN ST STE 2100 NORFOLK, VA 23510-1681
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-01-10
Status Date:
2011-09-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.