Trademark search for:

MIGHTY PUFF'EMS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2013-10-03 — Application filed
2013-10-07 — Application filed
2013-10-10 — Application filed
2013-10-11 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-01-16 — Assigned to examiner
2014-01-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-02-12 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-03-04 — Published for opposition
2014-03-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-04-09 — Assigned to examiner
2014-04-29 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-05-08 — Teas statement of use received
2014-05-08 — Use amendment filed
2014-06-04 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-06-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-06-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2014-06-21 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2014-07-29 — Registered-principal register
2016-06-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-07-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-09-17 — Teas change of owner address received
2019-09-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-03-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2021-03-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Plum, PBC
Camden , NJ

Plum, PBC
Emeryville , CA

Plum, PBC
Emeryville , CA

Correspondent

JENNIFER C. DEBROW Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
80 South Eighth Street
500 IDS Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-10-03

Status Date:
2021-03-05

Category:
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery

Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.