Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2014 ›
FO ›
FORTE KAFFASYS
Trademark search for:
FORTE KAFFASYS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-03-06 — Application filed
2014-03-10 — Application filed
2014-03-20 — Application filed
2014-03-21 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2014-06-10 — Assigned to examiner
2014-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-12 — Office action issued
2014-12-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-12-13 — Teas request to divide received
2014-12-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-12-13 — Divisional request received
2015-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-01-14 — Divisional processing complete
2015-01-15 — Suspension letter written
2015-01-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-01-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-07-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-01-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-01-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-01-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-08-12 — Application abandoned
2016-08-12 — Application abandoned
2016-08-12 — Final status recorded
Correspondent
HELENA H. KWON LEXYOUME IP MEISTER, PLLC 5180 PARKSTONE DR STE 175 CHANTILLY, VA 20151-3827 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-03-06
Status Date:
2016-08-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.