Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Meats & Dairy ›
1993 ›
NE ›
NEKTACREME
Trademark search for:
NEKTACREME
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1993-04-02 — Application filed
1993-07-08 — Assigned to examiner
1993-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
1994-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-03-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
1994-08-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-09-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-09-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
1994-10-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
1995-03-01 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-06-20 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-07-05 — Assigned to examiner
1995-07-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
1995-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-11-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
1995-12-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1995-12-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
1996-01-16 — Notice of publication
1996-02-13 — Published for opposition
1996-05-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1996-11-07 — Notice of allowance cancelled
1997-03-26 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
1997-05-06 — Registered-principal register
1997-11-07 — Sec 7 request filed
2004-02-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2004-02-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Nekta Foods Limited
Cambridge NZ
Nekta Foods Limited
Cambridge NZ
Nekta Foods Limited
Cambridge NZ
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 26TH FL 150 E 42ND ST NEW YORK, NY 10017-5612
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1993-04-02
Status Date:
2004-02-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.