Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LUNCHBOX SIMPLICITY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-09-12 — Application filed
  • 2008-09-16 — Application filed
  • 2008-09-17 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2008-12-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-02-26 — Office action issued
  • 2009-02-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-07-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-07-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-07-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-07-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-08-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-08-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-08-11 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-08-11 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-08-11 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-08-11 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-08-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-08-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-08-19 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-09-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-09-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-12-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-05-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-05-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-05-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-05-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-11-03 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-11-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-11-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-11-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-11-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-12-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-06-15 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-06-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-06-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-06-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-12-15 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-12-15 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-12-20 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-12-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-12-23 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-12-23 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-01-04 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-01-04 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-01-10 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-01-11 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2012-02-14 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-04-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-11-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-03-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-07-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-07-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-02-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-09-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-09-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PLUM, PBC
EMERYVILLE , CA
PLUM INC.
EMERYVILLE , CA
THE NEST COLLECTIVE, INC.
EMERYVILLE , CA
Nest Naturals, Inc.
Emeryville , CA
Nest Naturals, Inc.
Emeryville , CA
Nest Naturals, Inc.
Emeryville , CA

Correspondent

Jennifer C. Debrow GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
80 South Eighth Street
500 IDS Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-09-12
Status Date:
2018-09-21
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.