Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LEENLIFE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-06-30 — Application filed
  • 2011-05-05 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2011-05-09 — Application filed
  • 2011-05-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-05-13 — Application filed
  • 2011-05-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-31 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-31 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-31 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-18 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-12-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-02-25 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-25 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-02-25 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-02-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-02-27 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2012-04-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-04-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2012-07-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-10-10 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2012-10-10 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2012-10-22 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
  • 2012-10-30 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2012-11-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-11-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-06-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-07-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-11-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-11-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2014-05-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-05-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-05-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-05-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-05-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2014-06-18 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2014-06-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2014-06-18 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2014-07-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2014-07-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2014-07-09 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2014-07-09 — Notice of publication
  • 2014-07-12 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2014-12-23 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2015-01-06 — Office action issued
  • 2015-01-06 — Office action issued
  • 2015-01-07 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2015-01-09 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2015-01-21 — Post publication amendment - entered
  • 2015-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2015-07-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2015-07-16 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
  • 2015-07-16 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2016-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-07-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-08-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-06-30 — Final status recorded
  • 2021-07-18 — Death of international registration
  • 2021-07-19 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

LeenLife Polska S.A.
PL
LeenLife Polska S.A.
PL

Correspondent

JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP
135 S JACKSON STREET
SUITE 200
GLENDALE, CA 91205

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-06-30
Status Date:
2020-06-30
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.