Brandinium

Trademark search for:

NARGISI KOFTA WAS NEVER SO HEALTHY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-11-01 — Application filed
  • 2011-11-04 — Application filed
  • 2011-11-05 — Application filed
  • 2011-11-11 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2011-11-17 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2011-12-07 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2011-12-07 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-02-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-02-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-02-29 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-03-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-03-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-04-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-04-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-06-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-10-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-10-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-11-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-11-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-11-26 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2012-11-26 — Office action issued
  • 2012-11-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-11-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-11-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2012-11-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-11-28 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-12-05 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-12-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2012-12-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-06-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2013-06-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2013-06-10 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2013-06-10 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-06-10 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-07-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-07-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2013-07-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-12-05 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-12-05 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2014-01-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2014-01-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2014-01-15 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2014-01-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-01-15 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2014-01-15 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2014-01-15 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2014-01-15 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2014-01-24 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2014-01-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2014-01-25 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2014-01-31 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
  • 2014-02-05 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2014-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-02-07 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2014-02-08 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
  • 2014-03-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-10-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-10-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

GOURMET LANI LLC
Honolulu , HI
GOURMET LANI LLC
Honolulu , HI
GOURMET LANI'S INC.
Burlington Ontario CA
GOURMET LANI'S INC.
Burlington Ontario CA

Correspondent

MONICA KOUR GOURMET LANI
WWW.GOURMETLANI.COM
1104 BISHOP ST
HONOLULU, HI 96813

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-11-01
Status Date:
2020-10-23
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.