Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CAMPOFRIO FOOD GROUP

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-09-19 — Application filed
  • 2012-09-22 — Application filed
  • 2012-09-22 — Application filed
  • 2012-09-25 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2012-10-05 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2012-10-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-10-24 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2012-11-05 — Priority action written
  • 2012-11-05 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2012-11-05 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2012-11-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-02-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-02-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-03-19 — Office action issued
  • 2013-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-03-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-04-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-04-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-04-22 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2013-04-22 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2013-04-24 — Notice of publication
  • 2013-05-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-05-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-05-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-07-09 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2013-12-31 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-12-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2013-12-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2014-01-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-04-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-07-07 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-07-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2014-08-04 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2014-08-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2014-08-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-12-15 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-12-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2015-01-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2015-01-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-07-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2015-07-06 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2015-07-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2015-07-22 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2015-07-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-12-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-12-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-01-07 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2016-01-07 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2016-01-07 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2016-01-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2016-07-05 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2016-07-05 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2016-07-05 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2016-08-11 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2016-09-13 — Registered-principal register
  • 2018-01-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-01-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-04-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2021-09-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-03-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-03-24 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CAMPOFRIO FOOD GROUP, S.A.U.
LA MORALEJA ES
CAMPOFRIO FOOD GROUP, S.A.
Alcobendas (Madrid) ES
CAMPOFRIO FOOD GROUP, S.A.
Alcobendas (Madrid) ES
CAMPOFRIO FOOD GROUP, S.A.
Alcobendas (Madrid) ES

Correspondent

Lori S. Kozak Fox Rothschild LLP
997 Lenox Drive, Building 3
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-09-19
Status Date:
2023-03-24
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.