Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SKINNY BITCH

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2015-02-20 — Application filed
  • 2015-02-24 — Application filed
  • 2015-03-07 — Application filed
  • 2015-05-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-06-05 — Priority action written
  • 2015-06-05 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-06-05 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-07-08 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-07-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-08-11 — Office action issued
  • 2015-08-11 — Office action issued
  • 2015-08-11 — Office action issued
  • 2015-09-29 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2015-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-09-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-10-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-10-09 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-10-28 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-11-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-11-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-12-17 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2016-05-31 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2016-06-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-06-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-07-12 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-07-20 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2017-01-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-01-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2017-01-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2017-01-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-07-12 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2017-08-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2017-08-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2017-09-12 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2017-09-12 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2017-09-12 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2017-09-13 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2017-09-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2017-10-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2017-10-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2017-10-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-01-12 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2018-01-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-01-16 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2018-01-16 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2018-01-16 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2018-01-17 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2018-01-18 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2018-01-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-07-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2018-07-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2018-07-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2018-07-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-08-08 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-11-30 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2018-11-30 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2019-01-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2019-01-12 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2019-01-15 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2019-01-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2019-08-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2019-08-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2019-08-12 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DRINKS FOR BEAUTY LTD
BRIGHTON GB
LOHAS TRADING COMPANY LTD
BRIGHTON, EAST SUSSEX GB
Express Kings Tea Limited
Burgess Hill GB
Express Kings Tea Limited
Burgess Hill GB

Correspondent

Vian Nguyen
7 Baywood Gardens
Woodingdean, Brighton, BN26BN
UNITED KINGDOM

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-02-20
Status Date:
2019-08-12
Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.