Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Hand Tools ›
1997 ›
SM ›
SMART-SPLITTER
Trademark search for:
SMART-SPLITTER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-12-09 — Application filed
1998-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
1998-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
1998-12-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-02-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
1999-03-26 — Notice of publication
1999-04-27 — Published for opposition
1999-07-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1999-10-15 — Use amendment filed
1999-10-15 — Statement of use processing complete
1999-11-26 — Assigned to examiner
1999-11-30 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2000-02-22 — Registered-principal register
2006-01-10 — Paper received
2006-01-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2006-03-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2006-05-22 — Case file in ticrs
2009-12-14 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2010-01-04 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2010-01-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2010-08-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-08-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2021-10-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
LOGOSOL AB
HÄRNÖSAND SE
Agma AB
SE-903 27 UMEA SE
Agma AB
S-721 35 Vasteras SE
Agma AB
S-721 35 Vasteras SE
Correspondent
GEORGE M. KAPLAN Dilworth & Barrese, LLP 1000 Woodbury Road, Suite 405 Woodbury, NY 11797 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-12-09
Status Date:
2021-10-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.