Trademark search for:

MAXAHOLIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2002-02-01 — Application filed
2002-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
2002-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
2002-05-06 — Final disposition recorded
2002-10-28 — Paper received
2002-10-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2003-01-31 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-02-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-04-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-04-30 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-05-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-05-16 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-05-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-06-11 — Notice of publication
2003-07-01 — Published for opposition
2003-09-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-02-23 — Paper received
2004-02-23 — Use amendment filed
2004-03-16 — Statement of use processing complete
2004-03-23 — Case file in ticrs
2004-03-24 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-07-27 — Registered-principal register
2008-12-09 — Paper received
2008-12-23 — Review of correspondence complete
2011-03-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2011-03-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DR. ER'LS TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Sierra Madre , CA

DR. ER'LS TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Sierra Madre , CA

DR. ER'LS TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Sierra Madre , CA

Correspondent

JAMES M. DUNCAN KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER
4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE 2ND FLOOR
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-02-01

Status Date:
2011-03-04

Category:
Hand Tools

Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.