Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Hand Tools ›
2002 ›
XT ›
XTREME FINISHES
Trademark search for:
XTREME FINISHES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-08-28 — Application filed
2003-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
2003-01-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-03-12 — Notice of publication
2003-04-01 — Published for opposition
2003-04-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-04-29 — Extension of time to oppose received
2004-03-05 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2004-03-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-04-13 — Fax received
2004-08-24 — Case file in ticrs
2004-09-03 — Sou teas extension received
2004-09-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-09-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-03-21 — Sou teas extension received
2005-03-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-04-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-09-21 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-21 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-09-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-03-17 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-17 — Sou extension 4 granted
2006-03-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-09-18 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-18 — Sou extension 5 filed
2006-10-18 — Sou extension 5 granted
2007-03-24 — Final status recorded
2007-06-01 — Application abandoned
2007-06-01 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Wise, Robert W.
Petaluma , CA
Wise, Robert W.
Petaluma , CA
Correspondent
ROBERT C CUMBOW GRAHAM & DUNN PC 2801 ALASKAN WAY STE 300 PIER 70 SEATTLE, WA 98121-1128 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-08-28
Status Date:
2007-03-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.