Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Hand Tools ›
2016 ›
BE ›
BEAUTY LINE
Trademark search for:
BEAUTY LINE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-06-01 — Application filed
2016-06-04 — Application filed
2016-06-08 — Application filed
2016-09-14 — Assigned to examiner
2016-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2017-04-12 — Application abandoned
2017-04-12 — Application abandoned
2017-06-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-06-09 — Teas petition to revive received
2017-06-09 — Petition to revive-granted
2017-06-09 — Office action issued
2017-06-09 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2017-07-18 — Assigned to lie
2017-07-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-07-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-29 — Office action issued
2017-07-29 — Office action issued
2017-07-29 — Office action issued
2018-01-29 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-02-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-02-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-05-08 — Office action issued
2018-05-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-05-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-05-21 — Office action issued
2018-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
2018-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
2018-06-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-06-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-06-22 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2018-06-22 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2018-06-22 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2018-07-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-07-17 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2018-07-17 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2018-07-17 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2018-08-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-08-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-08-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-08-20 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2018-08-20 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2018-08-20 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2018-09-03 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-09-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-09-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-09-06 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2018-09-06 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2018-09-06 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2018-10-11 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-10-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-10-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-10-16 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2018-10-16 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2018-10-16 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2019-05-24 — Application abandoned
2019-05-24 — Application abandoned
2019-05-24 — Final status recorded
2019-07-17 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
Owner Information
Zhao Jing
Shenzhen, Guangdong CN
Correspondent
Zhao Jing Nanshan Dist. No.3688, Nanhai Blvd. SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG,
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-06-01
Status Date:
2019-05-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.