Brandinium

Trademark search for:

THE LAST BEST PLACE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-08-13 — Application filed
  • 2001-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-09-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-06-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2002-10-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-24 — Reinstated
  • 2002-12-20 — Office action issued
  • 2003-06-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-06-20 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-08 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2003-07-14 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2003-07-14 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2003-10-06 — Action denying req for recon mailed
  • 2003-12-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2003-12-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2003-12-30 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-01-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-02-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-03-02 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-05-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-11-25 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2005-03-08 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2005-03-08 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-03-08 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-03-30 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2005-03-30 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2005-03-30 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2005-05-03 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-10-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-11-30 — Paper received
  • 2006-01-18 — Case returned to examination
  • 2006-01-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-01-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-05-22 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2006-07-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-07-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-10-06 — Fax received
  • 2006-11-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-11-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-11-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-11-20 — New noa to issue
  • 2007-01-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-06-28 — Fax received
  • 2007-06-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2007-11-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2007-12-30 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-12-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-12-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2008-07-01 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-07-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2008-07-08 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-09-02 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-09-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2009-03-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-09-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-03-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-09-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-03-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-09-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-09-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-03-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-11-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

The Last Best Beef LLC
Las Vegas , NV
The Last Best Beef LLC
Las Vegas , NV

Correspondent

Luke W. DeMarte SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Suite 2400
131 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-08-13
Status Date:
2012-11-26
Category:
Housewares & Glass
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.