Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Housewares & Glass ›
2003 ›
TH ›
THE ORIGINAL WIPE RACK
Trademark search for:
THE ORIGINAL WIPE RACK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-07-23 — Application filed
2004-02-03 — Assigned to examiner
2004-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
2004-09-03 — Application abandoned
2004-10-12 — Use amendment filed
2004-10-12 — Paper received
2004-10-12 — Petition to revive-received
2004-11-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-02-22 — Petition to revive-granted
2005-05-09 — Amendment to use processing complete
2005-05-09 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2005-05-09 — Use amendment accepted
2005-05-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2005-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2005-12-05 — Application abandoned
2005-12-06 — Application abandoned
2006-02-06 — Office action issued
2006-02-06 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-02-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-02-06 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-02-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-02-09 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2006-02-10 — Assigned to lie
2006-02-14 — Law office publication review completed
2006-03-28 — Registered-supplemental register
2012-11-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2012-11-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Barrow, Todd
Edmonds , WA
Barrow, Todd
Edmonds , WA
Correspondent
JOHN E RUSSELL ALLMARK TRADEMARK 4041 SUGAR MAPLE DR STE A DANVILLE, CA 94506 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-07-23
Status Date:
2012-11-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.