Trademark search for:

CRYST'L CLEAN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-06-17 — Application filed
2011-06-21 — Application filed
2011-06-22 — Application filed
2011-06-23 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-09-14 — Assigned to examiner
2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-20 — Application abandoned
2012-04-20 — Application abandoned
2012-04-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-04-26 — Office action issued
2012-04-26 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2012-04-26 — Petition to revive-granted
2012-04-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-04-26 — Teas petition to revive received
2012-05-15 — Office action issued
2012-05-15 — Office action issued
2012-05-15 — Office action issued
2012-06-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-06-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-02 — Office action issued
2013-01-28 — Application abandoned
2013-01-28 — Application abandoned
2013-01-28 — Final status recorded
2013-08-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-08-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received

Owner Information

EVRIHOLDER PRODUCTS LLC
Anaheim , CA

Correspondent

Gary Seehoff
1500 South Lewis Street
Anaheim, CA 92805
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-06-17

Status Date:
2013-01-28

Category:
Housewares & Glass

Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.