Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BLUE PEGASUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-01-18 — Application filed
  • 2005-01-27 — Application filed
  • 2005-08-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-02-22 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-04-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-04-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-07-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-08-10 — Paper received
  • 2006-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-09-01 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2006-10-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-10-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-12-02 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-12-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-04-09 — Office action issued
  • 2007-05-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-05-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-05-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-05-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-05-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-06-13 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-07-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-09-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-03-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-03-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-03-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-08-27 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-08-27 — Use amendment filed
  • 2008-09-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2008-09-02 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-16 — Office action issued
  • 2009-01-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-01-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-01-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-28 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-03-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-03-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-08-29 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-07-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-07-30 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2014-08-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-08-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2014-08-08 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2015-02-27 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2015-02-27 — Registered - sec. 15 affidavit filed
  • 2015-03-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-10-01 — Registered - sec. 15 acknowledged
  • 2015-10-01 — Sec. 15 acknowledgement - e-mailed
  • 2015-10-01 — Post registration action mailed no response required
  • 2015-11-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2015-11-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2018-03-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-11-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-11-12 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

THE DAVID ORECK CANDLE CO., L.P.
New Orleans , LA
Fragrant Passage Candle Co., L.P.
Greensboro , NC
Fragrant Passage Candle Co., L.P.
Greensboro , NC
Fragrant Passage Candle Co., L.P.
Greensboro , NC

Correspondent

Kathleen S. Ryan The Ollila Law Group LLC
2569 Park Lane
Suite 202
Lafayette, CO 80026

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-01-18
Status Date:
2021-11-12
Category:
Industrial Oils & Fuels
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.