Brandinium

Trademark search for:

NATTYMAC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-12-23 — Application filed
  • 2006-01-03 — Application filed
  • 2006-02-17 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2006-02-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-04-20 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2006-06-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-06-26 — Examiner's amendment/priority action mailed
  • 2006-06-26 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
  • 2006-12-19 — Office action issued
  • 2007-01-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-01-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-02-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-02-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-03-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-04-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-06-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-08-14 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-08-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2007-10-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-10-31 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2007-10-31 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-10-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-11-10 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-02-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2008-02-15 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2008-03-25 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-10-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-08-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2013-08-23 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2013-09-09 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-09-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-09-09 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2017-03-25 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2017-08-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2017-08-28 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2017-08-28 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2017-10-01 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-10-02 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2017-10-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-10-02 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2017-10-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2017-10-02 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2019-07-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2023-05-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-05-31 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2023-05-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-05-31 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-05-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-06-02 — Request for sect 7 total surrender filed
  • 2023-06-02 — Teas section 7 surrender received
  • 2024-01-29 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2024-02-08 — Cancelled section 7-total
  • 2024-02-08 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-02-09 — Notice of cancellation sec. 7 surrender emailed

Owner Information

MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA
CARMEL , IN
HOME POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
ANN ARBOR , MI
STONEGATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
INDIANAPOLIS , IN
NattyMac LLC
St. Petersburgh , FL
NattyMac LLC
St. Petersburgh , FL
NattyMac LLC
St. Petersburgh , FL

Correspondent

Govinda M. Davis Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
255 E Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Cincinnati, OH 45202
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-12-23
Status Date:
2024-02-08
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.