Brandinium

Trademark search for:

THE LIFE IN A DAY OF ELS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-04-26 — Application filed
  • 2005-05-09 — Application filed
  • 2005-11-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-11-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-12-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-12-07 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-12-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-01-04 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-01-24 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-04-18 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-09-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-09-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2006-09-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2007-04-18 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-04-18 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-04-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2007-10-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2007-12-18 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-12-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-02-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-02-25 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2008-02-25 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2008-02-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-02-25 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2008-02-28 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2008-04-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2008-06-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-06-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-08-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2008-08-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2008-08-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2008-09-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2008-09-09 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2008-10-18 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2008-10-20 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-10-22 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2008-11-30 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-11-30 — Use amendment filed
  • 2008-12-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2009-07-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-07-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-08-19 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-08-19 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-08-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-08-19 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2009-08-24 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-08-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-09-29 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-04-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-04-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-04-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-06-19 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2015-07-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-07-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2015-07-12 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2018-09-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-06-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-06-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
Chicago , IL
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
Chicago , IL
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
Chicago , IL

Correspondent

Everett E. Fruehling CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600
SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-04-26
Status Date:
2020-06-05
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.