Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Insurance & Finance ›
2011 ›
RU ›
RUSH FOR A CAUSE
Trademark search for:
RUSH FOR A CAUSE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-12-06 — Application filed
2011-12-09 — Application filed
2011-12-12 — Application filed
2012-03-17 — Assigned to examiner
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-09-17 — Office action issued
2012-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-09-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-09-28 — Assigned to lie
2012-09-29 — Law office publication review completed
2012-10-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-11-06 — Published for opposition
2012-11-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-01-22 — Registered-principal register
2018-01-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-03-29 — Teas section 8 received
2018-04-03 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2018-04-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2018-04-12 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2022-01-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-08-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-08-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
RUSH FOR A CAUSE
BRECKSVILLE , OH
RUSH FOR A CAUSE
BRECKSVILLE , OH
RUSH FOR A CAUSE
BRECKSVILLE , OH
Correspondent
Yao Liu CAVITCH, FAMILO & DURKIN CO., L.P.A. 1300 East 9th Street, 20th Floor CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1501 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-12-06
Status Date:
2023-08-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.