Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ARBIE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-11-01 — Application filed
  • 2013-11-05 — Application filed
  • 2013-11-06 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2013-11-06 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2013-11-13 — Application filed
  • 2014-02-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-02-19 — Priority action written
  • 2014-02-19 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2014-02-19 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2014-07-22 — Office action issued
  • 2014-07-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2014-08-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-08-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-08-26 — Office action issued
  • 2014-08-26 — Office action issued
  • 2014-08-26 — Office action issued
  • 2014-09-11 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-01-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-01-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-02-25 — Office action issued
  • 2015-03-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-03-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-03-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-03-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-03-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-09-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-09-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-09-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-09-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-10-05 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-10-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-05 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-04-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-06-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-06-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-06-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-06-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-06-28 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-07-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-08-02 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-08-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-10-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-05-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-05-11 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2020-05-11 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-05-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-05-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-05-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-05-11 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2020-06-16 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
  • 2021-10-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-04-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-04-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Royal Bank of Canada
MONTREAL, QUEBEC CA
Royal Bank of Canada
Montreal, Quebec CA
Royal Bank of Canada
Montreal, Quebec CA

Correspondent

Jeffrey D. Morton Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
400 E. Van Buren St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-11-01
Status Date:
2023-04-28
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.