Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ROBO-STOX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-01-02 — Application filed
  • 2013-01-12 — Application filed
  • 2013-01-15 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2013-04-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-04-22 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-04-22 — Approved for registration supplemental register
  • 2013-04-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-04-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-04-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-05-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-05-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-05-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-06-18 — Registered-supplemental register
  • 2014-03-19 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2014-06-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-03-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-04-05 — Cancellation denied no. 999999
  • 2016-04-06 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
  • 2016-04-15 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2016-04-15 — Cancelled section 18-total
  • 2016-04-15 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-11-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-11-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-01-05 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

ROBO-STOX LLC
DALLAS , TX
The Robot Report
Santa Barbara , CA
The Robot Report
Santa Barbara , CA

Correspondent

JOHN M. CONE FERGUSON BRASWELL FRASER KUBASTA PC
2500 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 600
PLANO, TX 75093
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-01-02
Status Date:
2016-04-15
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.