Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
1993 ›
NI ›
NIESSING RADIUS 9
Trademark search for:
NIESSING RADIUS 9
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1993-07-21 — Application filed
1993-12-16 — Assigned to examiner
1994-02-15 — Final disposition recorded
1994-06-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-07-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
1994-11-11 — Notice of publication
1994-12-13 — Published for opposition
1995-03-07 — Registered-principal register
2001-03-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2001-06-01 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
2001-06-13 — Response received to post reg. action - sec. 8 & 15
2001-08-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2003-02-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-05-03 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2005-05-03 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2005-08-12 — Assigned to paralegal
2005-08-17 — Assigned to paralegal
2005-08-17 — Assigned to paralegal
2005-08-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2005-08-17 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-06-29 — Case file in ticrs
2020-04-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2020-04-03 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Gebr. Niessing GmbH & Co.
D-48691 VREDEN DE
Gebr. Niessing GmbH & Co.
D-48691 Vreden DE
Gebr. Niessing GmbH & Co.
D-48691 Vreden DE
Correspondent
PETER J TOREN SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP 787 7TH AVE NEW YORK, NY 10019-6018 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1993-07-21
Status Date:
2020-04-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.