Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
1994 ›
DI ›
DIVE!
Trademark search for:
DIVE!
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1994-01-13 — Application filed
1994-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
1994-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
1994-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
1994-07-15 — Final disposition recorded
1994-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-02-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
1995-05-26 — Notice of publication
1995-06-27 — Published for opposition
1995-07-20 — Extension of time to oppose received
1995-09-05 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
1996-04-04 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
1996-04-04 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
1996-05-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1996-11-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
1996-11-27 — Use amendment filed
1996-11-29 — Application abandoned
1997-04-21 — Reinstated
1997-05-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
1997-05-21 — Statement of use processing complete
1997-05-23 — Divisional processing complete
1997-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
1997-07-25 — Final disposition recorded
1998-01-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-11-13 — Assigned to examiner
1998-11-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1999-03-02 — Registered-principal register
2005-12-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2005-12-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Mission Control
Chicago , IL
Mission Control
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
MATTHEW P HAMMATT KIRKLAND & ELLIS 200 E RANDOLPH DR STE 5300 CHICAGO, IL 60601 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1994-01-13
Status Date:
2005-12-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.