Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
1996 ›
AL ›
ALFRED DUNHILL AD 2000
Trademark search for:
ALFRED DUNHILL AD 2000
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1996-12-20 — Application filed
1997-07-07 — Assigned to examiner
1997-07-18 — Assigned to examiner
1997-07-18 — Assigned to examiner
1997-08-05 — Final disposition recorded
1998-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-01-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
1998-02-03 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1998-02-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-04-30 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
1999-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-01-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
2000-07-24 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2001-02-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-05-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-15 — Notice of publication
2001-09-04 — Published for opposition
2001-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-04-23 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2002-04-23 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2002-05-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2002-06-11 — Registered-principal register
2007-09-21 — Case file in ticrs
2009-03-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2009-03-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Alfred Dunhill Limited
St. James's GB
Alfred Dunhill Limited
St. James's GB
Alfred Dunhill Limited
St. James's GB
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1996-12-20
Status Date:
2009-03-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.