Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2004 ›
BR ›
BRIGHTER PRINCESS CUT
Trademark search for:
BRIGHTER PRINCESS CUT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-05-10 — Application filed
2004-05-20 — Application filed
2004-12-07 — Assigned to examiner
2004-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2004-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2005-02-07 — Teas amendment of use received
2005-02-07 — Use amendment filed
2005-02-09 — Office action issued
2005-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-03-01 — Amendment to use processing complete
2005-03-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-04-20 — Use amendment accepted
2005-04-20 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2005-04-28 — Assigned to lie
2005-04-28 — Law office publication review completed
2005-07-12 — Registered-supplemental register
2005-10-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-10-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-06-21 — Paper received
2007-06-21 — Sec 7 request filed
2007-07-12 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-08-02 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
2011-07-20 — Teas section 8 received
2011-07-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2011-07-28 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
E.F.D. Diamonds Company Limited
Ramat-Gan IL
E.F.D. Diamonds Company Limited
Ramat-Gan IL
Correspondent
Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq. MOSES & SINGER LLP 405 Lexington Avenue The Chrysler Building NEW YORK, NY 10174-1299
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-05-10
Status Date:
2016-02-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.