Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2004 ›
MA ›
MASTERPIECE ELEMENTS
Trademark search for:
MASTERPIECE ELEMENTS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-10-01 — Application filed
2004-10-08 — Application filed
2005-05-04 — Assigned to examiner
2005-05-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-05-06 — Assigned to lie
2005-05-10 — Law office publication review completed
2005-08-17 — Notice of publication
2005-09-06 — Published for opposition
2005-11-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-04-26 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-04-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-11-27 — Sou teas extension received
2006-11-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-11-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-05-29 — Sou teas extension received
2007-05-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-05-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-11-29 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-12-11 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2007-12-11 — Petition to revive-granted
2007-12-11 — Teas petition to revive received
2007-12-15 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-05-29 — Sou teas extension received
2008-05-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
2008-05-29 — Sou extension 5 granted
2008-12-29 — Application abandoned
2008-12-29 — Application abandoned
2008-12-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Fantasy Diamond Corporation
Chicago , IL
Fantasy Diamond Corporation
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
Lisa M. Holubar KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 E RANDOLPH ST STE 7300 CHICAGO, IL 60601-6524 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-10-01
Status Date:
2008-12-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.