Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2005 ›
IN ›
INFINITE 88S
Trademark search for:
INFINITE 88S
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-18 — Application filed
2005-03-23 — Application filed
2005-10-11 — Assigned to examiner
2005-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
2005-10-19 — Final disposition recorded
2005-11-10 — Paper received
2005-11-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-11-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-01-12 — Office action issued
2006-01-13 — Office action issued
2006-08-11 — Application abandoned
2006-08-11 — Application abandoned
2006-10-16 — Paper received
2006-10-16 — Petition to revive-received
2006-10-24 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2006-10-26 — Exparte appeal terminated
2006-10-30 — Exparte appeal terminated
2006-11-13 — Petition granted - ttab appeal filed
2006-11-13 — Assigned to petition staff
2006-12-04 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2006-12-04 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2007-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-25 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2007-04-23 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2007-05-31 — Application abandoned
2007-05-31 — Exparte appeal terminated
2007-05-31 — Final status recorded
2007-06-04 — Application abandoned
2011-04-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Eugene Biro Corporation
New York , NY
Correspondent
Robert D. Katz Cooper & Dunham LLP 30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th Floor New York, NY 10112-0015 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-18
Status Date:
2007-05-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.