Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CRUMPLED GOLD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-01-22 — Application filed
  • 2007-01-25 — Application filed
  • 2007-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-11-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-11-09 — Office action issued
  • 2007-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-12-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-12-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-12-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-06-12 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-06-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-06-18 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-06-18 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-06-18 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-12-24 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-01-28 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-01-28 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-02-04 — Paper received
  • 2009-02-04 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2009-02-17 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2009-02-24 — Petition granted - response received
  • 2009-02-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-03-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-03-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-03-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-09-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-09-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-09-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-09-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-17 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-02-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-02-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-02-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-02-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-03-30 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-03-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-05-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-08-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-08-27 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2010-08-27 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2010-08-27 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2010-10-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-09-13 — Paper received
  • 2012-10-01 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
  • 2013-09-18 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-10-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-02-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2017-05-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-05-12 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-05-16 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-05-16 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-05-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-05-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered

Owner Information

BIRKS GROUP INC.
MONTREAL CA
BIRKS GROUP INC.
MONTREAL CA
Birks & Mayors Inc.
Montreal CA
Birks & Mayors Inc.
Montreal CA
Birks & Mayors Inc.
Montreal CA

Correspondent

THOMAS W. BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
SUITE 1100
800 17TH STREET NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-01-22
Status Date:
2017-05-12
Category:
Jewelry
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.