Brandinium

Trademark search for:

INORI

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-09-10 — Application filed
  • 2008-09-15 — Application filed
  • 2008-09-16 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2008-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-12 — Removed from teas plus
  • 2008-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-12-18 — Office action issued
  • 2009-01-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-01-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-01-07 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-08-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-08-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-08-24 — Office action issued
  • 2009-08-24 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-08-24 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-08-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-09-04 — Data modification completed
  • 2009-09-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-09-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-09-09 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-09-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-09-23 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-09-30 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-10-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-12-10 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-12-10 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-01-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-01-29 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-07-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-07-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-01-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-01-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-03-09 — Office action issued
  • 2011-03-24 — Office action issued
  • 2011-03-24 — Office action issued
  • 2011-03-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-03-31 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-03-31 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-05-03 — Teas request for reinstatement
  • 2011-05-25 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2011-06-15 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-06-15 — Fax received
  • 2011-06-15 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2011-06-22 — Fax received
  • 2011-06-22 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2011-07-12 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-07-12 — Petition granted - sou filed
  • 2011-07-13 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-07-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2011-07-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-07-30 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-08-02 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-09-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-04-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-04-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

INORI USA, LLC
PORTLAND , OR
INORI USA, LLC
PORTLAND , OR
INORI, LLC
Portland , OR
INORI, LLC
PORTLAND , OR
Liam Group, LLC
Portland , OR

Correspondent

Benjamin D. Knaupp GARLAND GRIFFITHS KNAUPP, ATTORNEYS
305 N 1ST AVE
HILLSBORO, OR 97124-3003
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-09-10
Status Date:
2018-04-13
Category:
Jewelry
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.