Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2009 ›
QU ›
QUIT CUFF
Trademark search for:
QUIT CUFF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-02-21 — Application filed
2005-03-02 — Application filed
2005-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
2005-09-20 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-23 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-26 — Notice of publication
2005-11-15 — Published for opposition
2006-02-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-08-07 — Sou teas extension received
2006-08-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-08-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-02-07 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-02-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-02-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-02-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-04-30 — Assigned to examiner
2007-08-07 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-08-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-01-10 — Sou teas extension received
2008-01-10 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-01-10 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-08-07 — Sou teas extension received
2008-08-07 — Sou extension 5 filed
2008-08-07 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
2009-03-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Charles, Chelsea
Cordova , TN
Charles, Chelsea
Cordova , TN
Correspondent
Grady M. Garrison Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC 165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000 Memphis, TN 38103 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-02-21
Status Date:
2009-03-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.