Trademark search for:

SEAFENDER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-05-30 — Application filed
2011-07-14 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2011-07-15 — Application filed
2011-07-16 — Application filed
2011-07-20 — Application filed
2011-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
2011-09-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-10-05 — Notice of publication
2011-10-05 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-10-05 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2011-10-25 — Published for opposition
2012-01-10 — Registered-principal register
2012-02-09 — Grant of protection created, to be sent to ib
2012-02-12 — Notification processed by ib
2012-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-06 — Notification processed by ib
2015-01-15 — New representative at ib received
2018-08-17 — Cancelled section 71
2019-04-17 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2019-05-08 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2019-05-08 — Invalidation processed
2019-06-07 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2021-05-30 — Final status recorded
2021-12-25 — Death of international registration
2021-12-25 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed

Owner Information

Montres Corum Sàrl
CH

Montres Corum Sàrl
CH

Montres Corum Sàrl
CH

Correspondent

Inteltech SA
Rue Saint-Honoré 1,
Case postale 2510
CH-2001 Neuchâtel,

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-05-30

Status Date:
2021-05-30

Category:
Jewelry

Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.