Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2014 ›
JU ›
JUNGLEBLING
Trademark search for:
JUNGLEBLING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-04-25 — Application filed
2014-04-29 — Application filed
2014-05-09 — Application filed
2014-05-10 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-08-07 — Examiners amendment -written
2014-08-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-08-07 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-08-07 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-08-07 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-08-07 — Assigned to examiner
2014-08-15 — Assigned to lie
2014-08-15 — Law office publication review completed
2014-09-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-09-23 — Published for opposition
2014-09-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-11-18 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-05-18 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2015-06-22 — Application abandoned
2015-06-22 — Application abandoned
2015-08-19 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2015-08-19 — Petition to revive-granted
2015-08-19 — Teas petition to revive received
2015-09-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-09-21 — New noa to issue
2015-11-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
2016-06-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
JungleBling
East Hampton , NY
JungleBling
East Hampton , NY
Correspondent
JUNGLEBLING 2 COVEY CT EAST HAMPTON, NY 11937-2631 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-04-25
Status Date:
2016-06-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.