Trademark search for:

ACCESSORY HOLIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-09-06 — Application filed
2017-01-19 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2017-01-23 — Application filed
2017-01-23 — Assigned to examiner
2017-01-27 — Application filed
2017-02-06 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-07 — Office action issued
2017-02-07 — Office action issued
2017-02-07 — Office action issued
2017-02-24 — Office action issued
2017-07-28 — Office action issued
2017-07-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-08-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-08-23 — Notice of publication
2017-09-12 — Published for opposition
2017-11-28 — Registered-principal register
2018-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
2021-11-26 — New representative at ib received
2021-12-04 — New representative at ib received
2024-05-11 — New representative at ib received
2024-06-14 — Cancelled section 71
2024-06-14 — Final status recorded
2025-02-14 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2025-04-30 — Invalidation processed
2025-04-30 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2025-05-17 — Total invalidation processed by the ib

Owner Information

Kim Seung Cheol
KR

Kim Seung Cheol
KR

Kim Seung Cheol
KR

Correspondent

NAM & NAM World Patent & Law Firm
(KAL Bldg. 3rd Fl., Seosomun-dong),
117, Seosomun-ro,
Seoul,

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-09-06

Status Date:
2024-06-14

Category:
Jewelry

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.