Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2016 ›
FI ›
FILO D'AMORE
Trademark search for:
FILO D'AMORE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-01-29 — Application filed
2016-03-03 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2016-03-04 — Application filed
2016-03-08 — Application filed
2016-05-16 — Assigned to examiner
2016-05-19 — Final disposition recorded
2016-05-20 — Office action issued
2016-05-25 — Office action issued
2016-05-25 — Office action issued
2016-06-10 — Office action issued
2016-11-08 — Office action issued
2016-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-11-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-30 — Suspension letter written
2016-12-01 — Letter of suspension mailed
2017-06-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-08-09 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2017-08-09 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2017-08-25 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2018-01-05 — Assigned to examiner
2018-01-16 — Assigned to lie
2018-01-16 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-02-13 — Final disposition recorded
2018-02-14 — Final disposition recorded
2018-09-12 — Application abandoned
2018-09-12 — Application abandoned
2018-09-12 — Final status recorded
2019-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2019-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2019-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
Correspondent
Gianluca De Cristofaro Via della Moscova, 18 I-20121 Milano (MI), ITALY
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-01-29
Status Date:
2018-09-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.