Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2017 ›
RO ›
ROSEONLY.
Trademark search for:
ROSEONLY.
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-11-22 — Application filed
2018-02-22 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2018-02-23 — Application filed
2018-02-28 — Application filed
2018-03-06 — Application filed
2018-03-07 — Assigned to examiner
2018-03-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-03-16 — On hold - electronic record review required
2018-03-20 — Electronic record review complete
2018-04-04 — Notice of publication
2018-04-24 — Published for opposition
2018-05-15 — Extension of time to oppose received
2018-08-18 — Office action issued
2018-08-20 — Office action issued
2018-08-23 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2018-09-07 — Office action issued
2019-07-24 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2019-07-24 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2019-08-09 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2020-04-24 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2020-07-20 — Application abandoned
2020-07-20 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2020-07-20 — Final status recorded
2020-07-21 — Application abandoned
2021-07-20 — Final disposition recorded
2021-07-20 — Final disposition recorded
2021-08-07 — Final disposition recorded
Owner Information
Roseonly Beijing Commercial Co., Ltd.
CN
Roseonly Beijing Commercial Co., Ltd.
CN
Correspondent
YUE XU Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP 160 ALAMO PLAZA #942 ALAMO, CA 94507 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-11-22
Status Date:
2020-07-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.