Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Jewelry ›
2020 ›
DI ›
DINNER JEWELS
Trademark search for:
DINNER JEWELS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2020-09-21 — Application filed
2020-09-24 — Application filed
2020-10-28 — Application filed
2021-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
2021-02-24 — Examiners amendment -written
2021-02-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-02-24 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-02-25 — Assigned to lie
2021-02-25 — Examiner's amendment entered
2021-02-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2021-03-10 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2021-03-30 — Published for opposition
2021-03-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2021-05-25 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2021-10-19 — Sou teas extension received
2021-10-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
2021-10-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2021-10-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-05-21 — Sou teas extension received
2022-05-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2022-05-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2022-05-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-11-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2022-12-10 — Teas petition to revive received
2022-12-10 — Petition to revive-granted
2022-12-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2022-12-12 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2023-02-13 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2023-02-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
2023-02-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2023-05-25 — Sou extension 4 filed
2023-06-26 — Application abandoned
2023-06-26 — Application abandoned
2023-07-01 — Teas petition to revive received
2023-07-01 — Petition to revive-granted
2023-07-01 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2023-07-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-07-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-07-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-07-01 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2023-07-03 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2023-07-05 — Sou extension 4 granted
2023-07-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2023-11-27 — Sou extension 5 filed
2024-01-01 — Application abandoned
2024-01-02 — Application abandoned
2024-01-15 — Teas petition to revive received
2024-01-15 — Petition to revive-granted
2024-01-15 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2024-01-15 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2024-01-15 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2024-01-19 — Sou extension 5 granted
2024-01-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2024-05-25 — Use amendment filed
2024-05-25 — Teas statement of use received
2024-05-28 — Statement of use processing complete
2024-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2024-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2024-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2024-06-01 — Office action issued
2024-06-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2024-06-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2024-06-21 — Assigned to lie
2024-08-30 — Office action issued
2024-08-30 — Office action issued
2024-08-30 — Office action issued
2024-10-28 — Application filed
2024-10-28 — Application filed
2025-03-20 — Application abandoned
2025-03-20 — Application abandoned
2025-04-05 — Teas petition to revive received
2025-05-14 — Assigned to petition staff
2025-05-14 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2025-07-14 — Petition to revive-denied
2025-07-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Cognoscenti LLC
Livingston , NJ
Cognoscenti LLC
Livingston , NJ
Correspondent
Abiola Fasehun Fridman Law Group PLLC 169 Bowery New York, NY 10002 United States
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2020-09-21
Status Date:
2025-07-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.