Trademark search for:

PULSE LUXE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2012-07-04 — Application filed
2012-07-07 — Application filed
2012-07-12 — Application filed
2012-07-13 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-09-03 — Assigned to examiner
2012-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-10-22 — Office action issued
2012-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-11-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-11-29 — Assigned to lie
2012-11-29 — Law office publication review completed
2012-12-12 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-01-01 — Published for opposition
2013-01-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-02-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-09-30 — Application abandoned
2013-09-30 — Application abandoned
2013-09-30 — Final status recorded
2017-09-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-09-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-04-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-04-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-08-09 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2019-08-09 — Withdrawal of attorney granted

Owner Information

HAIR FASHION LOOP, INC.
CHICAGO , IL

HAIR FASHION LOOP, INC.
CHICAGO , IL

Correspondent

HAIR FASHION LOOP, INC.
6250 S. COTTAGE GROVE AVE
CHICAGO, IL 60637
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-07-04

Status Date:
2013-09-30

Category:
Lace & Embroidery

Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.