Trademark search for:

LUSH LUXE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2015-05-23 — Application filed
2015-05-27 — Application filed
2015-05-30 — Application filed
2015-08-14 — Assigned to examiner
2015-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-02-20 — Office action issued
2016-02-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-02-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-03-09 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-03-29 — Published for opposition
2016-03-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-04-27 — Extension of time to oppose received
2016-07-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2016-09-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-09-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-01-12 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2017-01-12 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2017-01-12 — Application abandoned
2017-01-12 — Application abandoned
2017-01-12 — Final status recorded
2017-08-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-08-09 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2019-08-09 — Withdrawal of attorney granted

Owner Information

Poey, Phanna
Lowell , MA

Barrie, Vanny
Cumming , MA

Poey, Phanna
Lowell , MA

Barrie, Vanny
Cumming , MA

Correspondent

Poey, Phanna
45 Meade Street
Lowell, MA 01852
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-05-23

Status Date:
2017-01-12

Category:
Lace & Embroidery

Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.