Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Lace & Embroidery ›
2017 ›
HA ›
HAIR SLINKY
Trademark search for:
HAIR SLINKY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-03-20 — Application filed
2017-03-23 — Application filed
2017-03-23 — Application filed
2017-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
2017-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2017-11-22 — Office action issued
2017-11-22 — Office action issued
2017-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-11-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-12-08 — Suspension letter written
2017-12-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-12-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-04-25 — Assigned to examiner
2018-06-26 — Assigned to lie
2018-06-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-06-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2018-06-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-06-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-12-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2018-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-12-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
2019-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
2019-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
2019-08-27 — Application abandoned
2019-08-27 — Final status recorded
2019-08-28 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Everatt, Donna M.
Toronto CA
Correspondent
EVERATT, DONNA M. 40 DELISLE AVE. SUITE 708 TORONTO, ONTARIO, M4V1S6 CANADA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-03-20
Status Date:
2019-08-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.