Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
1999 ›
VI ›
VIVITIX
Trademark search for:
VIVITIX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-06-03 — Application filed
1999-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
1999-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2000-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-04-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-06-16 — Notice of publication
2000-07-18 — Published for opposition
2000-10-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2001-04-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
2001-05-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2001-10-09 — Sou extension 2 filed
2001-10-25 — Sou extension 2 granted
2002-04-05 — Sou extension 3 filed
2002-04-08 — Paper received
2002-04-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2002-09-26 — Sou extension 4 filed
2002-09-30 — Paper received
2002-11-14 — Sou extension 4 granted
2003-04-10 — Use amendment filed
2003-04-10 — Statement of use processing complete
2003-04-14 — Paper received
2003-06-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2003-08-12 — Registered-principal register
2008-07-09 — Case file in ticrs
2008-10-15 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2008-10-17 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-11-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2014-03-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2014-03-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sanrio Company, Ltd.
Tokyo 141 JP
Sanrio Company, Ltd.
Tokyo 141 JP
Sanrio Company, Ltd.
Tokyo 141 JP
Correspondent
Noel M. Cook Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C. 455 Market Street, Suite 1910 San Francisco, CA 94105 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-06-03
Status Date:
2014-03-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.