Trademark search for:

GAPACCI

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2001-10-16 — Application filed
2001-12-07 — Assigned to examiner
2001-12-13 — Final disposition recorded
2001-12-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-04-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-05-31 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-06-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-08-07 — Notice of publication
2002-08-27 — Published for opposition
2002-11-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-12-16 — Paper received
2003-01-16 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2003-01-22 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2004-10-26 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2004-10-26 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-10-26 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-10-26 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-10-26 — Application abandoned
2004-11-01 — Application abandoned
2004-11-15 — Paper received
2004-11-18 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-11-18 — Application abandoned
2004-11-18 — Application abandoned
2004-11-18 — Final status recorded
2004-11-27 — Paper received
2005-09-02 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed
2005-09-06 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed

Owner Information

PAVIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LOS ANGELES , CA

PAVIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LOS ANGELES , CA

Correspondent

PAVIO INTERNATIONAL INC
230 W 22ND ST
LOS ANGELES, CA 90007-1432
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-10-16

Status Date:
2004-11-18

Category:
Leather Goods

Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.