Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2003 ›
CA ›
CASUAL ELEGANCE
Trademark search for:
CASUAL ELEGANCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-09-26 — Application filed
2004-04-17 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-02 — Examiner's amendment and/or priority action e-mailed
2004-11-02 — Office action issued
2004-11-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2004-11-08 — Paper received
2004-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-12-09 — Examiners amendment -written
2004-12-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-12-14 — Assigned to lie
2004-12-14 — Law office publication review completed
2005-01-26 — Notice of publication
2005-02-15 — Published for opposition
2005-05-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-09-23 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-09-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-05-03 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-05-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-11-11 — Final status recorded
2007-01-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-01-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-01-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-01-19 — Application abandoned
2007-01-19 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Charlotte moss & Co.
New York , NY
Charlotte moss & Co.
New York , NY
Correspondent
Monica B. Richman Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-09-26
Status Date:
2006-11-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.