Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2003 ›
SH ›
SHEPARD FAIREY
Trademark search for:
SHEPARD FAIREY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-02-25 — Application filed
2011-03-01 — Application filed
2011-03-02 — Application filed
2011-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-27 — Assigned to examiner
2011-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
2011-06-01 — Office action issued
2011-06-03 — Assigned to lie
2011-06-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-06-30 — Office action issued
2011-06-30 — Office action issued
2011-06-30 — Office action issued
2011-10-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-10-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-11-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-11-07 — Assigned to lie
2011-11-07 — Law office publication review completed
2011-11-23 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2011-12-13 — Published for opposition
2011-12-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-02-07 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-09-10 — Application abandoned
2012-09-10 — Application abandoned
2012-09-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Fairey, Shepard
Los Angeles , CA
Fairey, Shepard
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
RICHARD SIGLER LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SIGLER 433 N CAMDEN DR STE 400 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4408 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-02-25
Status Date:
2012-09-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.