Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DOGGIE DANGLERS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-05-13 — Application filed
  • 2004-05-20 — Application filed
  • 2004-12-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-01-31 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-01-31 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2005-02-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2005-02-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-02-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-02-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-05-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-05-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2005-08-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-04-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-04-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-06-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-06-21 — Paper received
  • 2006-06-21 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2006-08-03 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2006-08-17 — Paper received
  • 2006-08-17 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2006-09-22 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2006-10-10 — Paper received
  • 2006-10-10 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2006-11-03 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2007-03-13 — Petition to revive-denied
  • 2007-03-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Francis, Patti
Tustin , CA
Francis, Patti
Tustin , CA

Correspondent

PATTI FRANCIS DOGGIE DANGLERS
10203 OVERLAND TRAIL
CHERRY VALLEY, CA 92223
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-05-13
Status Date:
2007-03-13
Category:
Leather Goods
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.