Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2005 ›
ME ›
MEGZ
Trademark search for:
MEGZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-06-27 — Application filed
2005-07-01 — Application filed
2006-01-18 — Assigned to examiner
2006-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2006-07-17 — Office action issued
2006-07-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-08-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-08-11 — Suspension letter written
2006-08-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2006-12-12 — Office action issued
2007-01-12 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2007-01-12 — Assigned to lie
2007-01-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-02-12 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-07-12 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-07-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-07-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-07-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-07-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-07-17 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-28 — Law office publication review completed
2007-08-15 — Notice of publication
2007-09-04 — Published for opposition
2007-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-05-28 — Final status recorded
2008-08-11 — Application abandoned
2008-08-11 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
ABL Asia Pacific Ltd
Sheu Wan HK
ABL Asia Pacific Ltd
Sheu Wan HK
Correspondent
ELIZABETH W KING KING LAW ASSOCIATES 5622 INWOOD DR HOUSTON, TX 77056-4012 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-06-27
Status Date:
2008-05-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.