Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2005 ›
OB ›
OBJETS D'AMOUR
Trademark search for:
OBJETS D'AMOUR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-21 — Application filed
2005-01-31 — Application filed
2005-08-19 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-19 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-20 — Application abandoned
2006-03-20 — Application abandoned
2006-03-27 — Office action issued
2006-03-27 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-03-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-27 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-03-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-03-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-03-31 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-12 — Law office publication review completed
2006-05-10 — Notice of publication
2006-05-30 — Published for opposition
2006-08-22 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-02-09 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-02-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-08-22 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-08-22 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
2008-02-14 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-02-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-06-19 — Application abandoned
2008-06-20 — Application abandoned
2008-06-20 — Application abandoned
2008-06-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Henri Bendel, Inc.
New York , NY
Henri Bendel, Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
LORI A SLAWINSKI HENRI BENDEL INC 7 LIMITED PKWY E REYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-21
Status Date:
2008-06-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.