Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2006 ›
CO ›
CODE ROVER
Trademark search for:
CODE ROVER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-01-29 — Application filed
2007-02-01 — Application filed
2007-02-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-02-09 — Assigned to examiner
2007-03-09 — Assigned to lie
2007-03-09 — Law office publication review completed
2007-04-18 — Notice of publication
2007-05-08 — Published for opposition
2007-07-31 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-11-08 — Teas statement of use received
2007-11-08 — Use amendment filed
2007-11-29 — Statement of use processing complete
2007-12-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2008-01-25 — Law office registration review completed
2008-01-25 — Assigned to lie
2008-03-04 — Registered-principal register
2011-06-20 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2011-08-10 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2014-02-27 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2014-02-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-02-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-03-01 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
2014-10-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-10-10 — Final status recorded
2020-11-11 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
Owner Information
Academy, Ltd.
Katy , TX
Academy, Ltd.
Katy , TX
Academy, Ltd.
Katy , TX
Correspondent
Anthony J. Malutta KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-01-29
Status Date:
2014-10-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.